Paper presented for book without knowledge or consent of co-authors

Paper presented for book without knowledge or consent of co-authors

Case Sound:

A write-up had been submitted by matching writer (CA) on 19 December 2011. The article was accepted for publication on 23 March 2012 after several revisions. The content had been posted online 8 May 2012.
• Co-author A claims that this paper ended up being submitted to journal A by CA during her lack (maternity leave).
At the full time of distribution, CA was a PhD pupil at a study centre (X).
On 21 November 2012, co-author />• Co-author A claims that she and also the other 7 co-authors (writers B, C, D, E, F, G and H) are not informed in regards to the book in log A by CA.
• Co-author A claims that 90% regarding the information presented in this paper had been acquired during work done into the laboratories at research centre X, would be the home of X, and certainly will simply be posted by the X employee and cannot be distributed or posted without X’s permission. According to co-author A, CA does know this as he finalized a agreement with centre X.
• Co-author A mentions that she recently presented an updated form of the exact same paper to some other log. A is the corresponding author for this submission, co-author. All writers (including CA!) decided to this book. (NB: Journal B is a log with an increased effect element than journal A.)

On 3 December 2012, the editor-in-chief of log A informed co-authors A and CA and all sorts of associated with other co-authors (B, C, D, E, F, G and H) for the chance of publishing an erratum. Leer más